Best Fertility & TTC Blogs of 2025
We evaluated the top fertility and trying-to-conceive blogs on medical accuracy, content depth, community support, and whether they actually help people navigate one of the most emotionally and medically complex chapters of family planning.
5 items ranked · Last reviewed January 2025
FertilityIQ
The most data-driven fertility resource on the internet, built by patients who needed it themselves
FertilityIQ is what every fertility resource aspires to be and few actually achieve: genuinely useful. Built by Jake and Deborah Anderson-Bialis after their own IVF journey, the site combines a massive database of real patient clinic reviews with science-backed articles on every drug, protocol, and procedure in the fertility playbook. The depth is unmatched anywhere on the web — if you are considering IVF or trying to choose a clinic, start here and nowhere else.
PROS
- ✓Real patient reviews of hundreds of fertility clinics give you data no doctor's office brochure will ever show you — success rates, bedside manner, billing transparency, all of it
- ✓Drug guides and protocol explainers are written at a level that actually prepares you for IVF, not just familiarizes you with it
- ✓Founded by patients who went through IVF themselves — the editorial voice has genuine empathy baked in, not just clinical authority
CONS
- ✕The depth that makes it great can also make it overwhelming for someone just starting their TTC research
- ✕Clinic database is U.S.-centric — international readers get the education content but not the core directory value
RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association
America's leading nonprofit for infertility — advocacy, community, and education under one roof
RESOLVE is the institutional backbone of the infertility community in the United States, and its blog reflects that authority. The content is consistently well-sourced, the community resources are unmatched in scope, and the advocacy work — pushing for insurance coverage mandates, legislative protections, and workplace awareness — gives the blog a dimension that purely educational competitors simply do not have. When you need to feel less alone or understand your legal rights as a patient, RESOLVE is the place.
PROS
- ✓Unmatched credibility — as the national nonprofit for infertility, RESOLVE's content carries institutional authority that no individual blogger can match
- ✓Community support resources — local chapters, peer-led support groups, and the HopeAward blog network — go far beyond what a standard editorial blog offers
- ✓Advocacy coverage means the blog addresses the legal, insurance, and political landscape of infertility, not just the medical one
CONS
- ✕Publishing cadence can be slower than personal blogs or commercial sites with larger editorial teams
- ✕Content sometimes skews toward advocacy and awareness over the practical, step-by-step guidance that people deep in a treatment cycle need most
Evidence Based Birth
A PhD nurse who reads the actual research so you understand what the studies really say
Evidence Based Birth exists because too much parenting and fertility content is confidently wrong, and Rebecca Dekker decided to fix that. Every article goes back to the actual research — not a press release about a study, not a summary of a summary, but the primary literature — and the result is content that holds up in a way that most health blogs do not. If you want to understand what the evidence actually says about a fertility intervention or test, this is the most rigorous free resource available.
PROS
- ✓Rebecca Dekker goes back to primary research — peer-reviewed studies, Cochrane reviews, clinical guidelines — and translates them in a way that actually holds up to scrutiny
- ✓Articles are cited and linked, so you can verify the evidence yourself rather than taking the blogger's word for it
- ✓Covers controversial and often-misrepresented topics — miscarriage rates, fertility testing accuracy, prenatal supplement evidence — with nuance other blogs avoid
CONS
- ✕Content is dense and research-forward — this is not a casual scroll, it requires active reading
- ✕Primary focus is birth rather than pre-conception, so TTC-specific content is a smaller portion of the overall library
What to Expect — Trying to Conceive
The most accessible entry point for anyone just starting their TTC journey
What to Expect is where most people start their TTC research, and for good reason — the content is medically reviewed, clearly written, and covers every foundational question a first-time TTC reader will have. It is not the deepest resource on this list, but it is the most approachable, and sometimes that is exactly what someone needs at 11pm when they are Googling ovulation windows for the first time. A dependable, well-maintained starting point.
PROS
- ✓Best-in-class readability — content is medically reviewed but written at a level that anyone can understand on the first read
- ✓Massive community forums mean almost every question has been asked and answered by someone who has been there
- ✓Breadth of coverage is unmatched — ovulation basics to IVF explainers to miscarriage support all live in one organized resource
CONS
- ✕The accessible tone comes at the cost of depth — readers who want to understand the science behind a recommendation will need to look elsewhere
- ✕High ad load and commercial product integration can make the editorial content feel cluttered
IVF Connections
Patient-to-patient IVF support and shared journey documentation going back decades
IVF Connections is not the most polished resource on this list, but it offers something the others cannot: the unfiltered, longitudinal experience of real patients documenting real cycles over many years. For someone about to start IVF who wants to understand what the emotional and logistical reality looks like — the waiting, the injections, the failed cycles, the eventual successes — the community here provides a kind of honesty that clinical articles simply cannot replicate.
PROS
- ✓One of the longest-running IVF patient communities online — the archived journey posts give a longitudinal, deeply human look at what IVF actually looks like across years of trying
- ✓Community discussion boards provide real peer support from people at every stage of treatment, not just polished editorial advice
- ✓Patient-shared protocol details and medication experiences give practical context that clinical resources often omit
CONS
- ✕Content quality is uneven — community-generated posts are not medically reviewed, and some older posts reflect outdated protocols
- ✕Site design and functionality has not kept pace with modern blog standards, which can make finding relevant information cumbersome